|

“Another ‘Sore on the Body Politic’”

Statesman. "I can tell an Aristocrat by his Clean Collar."

Cartoonist
Thomas Nast defends the United States Military Academy at West Point
from charges of elitism by contracting the image of a clean-cut cadet
against the political ruffians of Tammany Hall. His illustration
is similar in subject and composition to a later cartoon in which he
champions the New York National Guard. Here, the
dutiful young man is literally upright, while the shoulder-hitters
lounge informally in chairs, as they smoke, drink (notice the broken
bottle), and gripe at the Five Points Inn. (Five Points was a
poor, gang-infested neighborhood in New York City, and is used here as a
symbolic counterpoint to West Point.)
This cartoon appeared at a time when the
Democratically-controlled Congress was reducing military appropriations
across the board. The Democratic policy reflected traditional
American hostility against a large standing army in peacetime, but also
resentment over recently ended Reconstruction (which had been enforced
by the U.S. Army in the South), and an attempt to foreclose the
military's ability to police elections in the Democratic strongholds of
Northern cities as well as the South. (For more information, see
Nast's cartoon of January 25, 1879.) Nast sarcastically
applies to West Point the condemnation by Congressman
Washington Witthorne of Tennessee, the Democratic chairman of the House
Naval Affairs Committee, that the army was a "sore on the body
politic.”
Since serving as General George Washington's
headquarters in 1779, during the Revolutionary War, West Point has been
the oldest continuously occupied fort in the United States. In 1802,
President Thomas Jefferson signed a bill establishing it as the location
of the United States Military Academy. Under Colonel Sylvanus
Thayer (1817-1833), military discipline and a code of honor were
instilled, and civil engineering formed the core of the
curriculum. West Point alum first gained national recognition in
the War with Mexico (1846-1848) and dominated the military leadership of
both the Union and the Confederacy during the Civil War.
The decades following the Civil War,
however, are often viewed as years of stagnation in the history of West
Point, with the number of cadets, the curriculum, and the physical
layout of the campus changing little at a time when other American
colleges experienced rapid expansion and development. Entrance requirements
were not difficult to meet in the late-nineteenth century, so most
candidates were accepted (although only 40% in 1879, for example,
graduated). Requests by reformers to raise academic standards were
resisted by Congress and influential military leaders for fear that
doing so would, in the words of General William Sherman, "exclude
the sons of poor
parents or of those so situated as to be unable to give their sons the education
required."
Both Sherman and his successor
as general-in-chief, Philip Sheridan, were both determined to preserve
West Point as it had existed in their youth, thus impeding change.
The college's professors (overwhelmingly alumni) controlled much of the
college administration in these years (since the superintendent was a
temporary position) and heavily favored the status quo. Congressional oversight of West Point was strict, and congressmen were
quick to intervene when one of their district's nominees faced academic
or disciplinary trouble.
In addition to the general
hostility against the military, West Point was criticized for several
specific reasons. While West Pointers had performed well in the
Civil War, several opinion-makers were galled that so many from that
national institution had fought for the Confederacy. With the rise
of state universities during the post-war period, the school lost it edge in engineering and science, which
undercut its ability to
justify its existence. To critics, West Point produced an elite
corps of officers, which ran contrary to the democratic tradition of
citizen-soldiers.
Corresponding to Nast's
cartoon, Harper's Weekly reprinted a letter that appeared in The
New York Times, whose author denied that West Point was
aristocratic. Rather than the wealthy sons of privilege, the
cadets came from all over the country, and the majority were awkward
farm boys who the military academy made into first-class
men. Of the typical graduating cadet, the letter-writer observed:
"Four years ago he was probably such a green and gaping boy as several of those
who are now staring at him. But he has been rubbed down and polished with
merciless severity, and he bears himself like a gentleman. He stands uncovered,
holding his hat in hand, because he is in the presence of his father and
strangers, but his bearing is easy and self-possessed; his appearance is
punctiliously neat; his manner polite and respectful. You see he has been taught
self-respect in its highest sense, which means respect to others. He will
neither overstep the proper line toward them nor permit it to be overstepped
toward himself; and this is one of the things which West Point teaches, and
which is not down in the text-books."
Robert C. Kennedy
|

|
|